Lord Oxburgh's enquiry into the climate change con was a total whitewash. The enquiry was rushed through to avoid too much prolonged publicity about the fact that there are any people who even disagree with the theory that anthropogenic climate change exists.
There are several fundamental falacies with this inquiry.
Apart from the fact that he was elevated to the lofty position of a Lord in the House of Leeches, oops, I mean Lords, by the corrupt Blair government, you remember them don't you, the ones who did such a good job on the economy that the tax payers of this country had to bail out private banking debts incurred by the gambling of the ultra rich who themselves suffered no penitence, remeber the government who took us to war on a lie (WMD - remember them - we only had 45 minutes to find shelter from Saddam's bombs - you know, the ones they couldn't find any trace of? The government that sacked Michael Meecher for speaking out against the war on Iraq and the lies being told about the intelligence?) yeah you remember know don't you.
The main issue is that Lord Oxburgh has a lifetime of commitment to this cause which has been well rewarded both outwardly and financially. Specifically he was at time he was appointed to head this enquiry chairman of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association and the wind energy company Falck Renewables, both have a highly significant financial interest in manmade co2 induced climate change.
Indeed carbon tax trading and alternative energy technology will become the world's greatest wealth producing industries over the next 50 years, but they absolutely depend on anthropogenic co2 induced climate change being accepted by the general population.
Note that if any part of this falls down,the climate change, the co2 or the anthropogenic (man-made) part then carbon taxing and carbon trading has no just cause. That means non man made co2 induced climate change, man made but not co2 caused climate change, climate change caused by non man made increases in co2 levels or no climate change at all, are all possibilities that would exclude the justification for taxation based on co2 emissions.
This was the worst and most transparent whitewash in recent times, all you see from supporters of the man made co2 induced climate change theory is name calling, and abuse, they call those who disagree with the theory 'conspiracy nuts' and the like but make no discernable reference to addressing the fact that the head of this enquiry had an extreme vendetta for bias.
This was tantamount to asking Josef Mengele to head an enquiry into whether human experimentation was ethical.
These cons are becoming so transparent it is sad to see people incapable of shaking off a lifetime of brainwashing to see the truth for what it is. The same people who are incapable of understanding that this country was taken to war on a country on the grounds that they could and were intending to launch an attack on our country with a huge and well developed arsenal of weapons. Aside from the obvious fact that to do so would have been suicide and Saddam was having a really rather too comfortable a time of things living it up in his palaces to want to do something that stupid, the FACT remains that there were NO WMD whatsover, Iraq had NO CAPABILITY OF LAUNCHING AN ATTACK ON THIS COUNTRY IN YEARS NEVER MIND IN 45 MINUTES.
WHAT SO MANY PEOPLE FAIL TO SEE IS THAT THERE COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN ANY INTELLIGENCE OF SUCH WEAPONS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST - WHICH MEANS ONLY ONE THING - THIS WAS A DELIBERATE FABRICATION.
And just like the Iraq war or the invasion of Afghanistan, MAN MADE co2 induced climate change is a total con, which is why you very rarely hear anybody in the main stream media refer to it as anything but "climate change", because you cannot argue that the climate is changing, it is, always has and always will do, the argument is that the co2 specifically created by mankind is what is driving it and the science to prove that specific point is so weak the lead scientists were fabricating data.
The main issue we face is that in an open minded country with free speech people who speak out against this idea are being demonized and the conflicting science is jeered at and denograted instead of being openly considered and discussed.
Consumer Slave